Engaging the Arctic: tourism, technology and the transformation of museum practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33112/arctour.4.2.4Keywords:
Arctic Tourism, Interactivity, Museums, Arctification, TechnologyAbstract
Technology has become an integral part of today’s society and is increasingly applied in various areas of tourism. Museums and visitor centres, in particular, have implemented the use of visual and interactive technologies to improve their exhibitions. These innovations have the ability to engage visitors more deeply, transforming traditional displays into immersive experiences. Such technological implementations have begun to emerge in the Arctic, yet research on their effects and potential remains limited. Their impact is reflected in the reception of such exhibitions, often documented in online reviews and comments.
Drawing on New Museology and the Contextual Model of Learning, this paper focuses on museums in Finland and Iceland, using netnography and thematic analysis to explore how visual and interactive technologies shape visitors’ perceptions of Arctic and subarctic environments and communities. Through an analysis of online reviews, the study identifies how technology is transforming the way tourists engage with and understand the Arctic. The study shows that technology alone is not enough to challenge stereotypes and promote sustainable tourism practices. Its effectiveness depends on the interplay between interactivity, performativity and human interactions.
Downloads
References
Balloffet, P., Courvoisier, F. H., & Lagier, J. (2014). From museum to amusement park: The opportunities and risks of edutainment. International Journal of Arts Management, 16, 4–16.
Bohn, D., & Varnajot, A. (2021). A geopolitical outlook on Arctification in northern Europe: Insights from tourism, regional branding and higher education institutions. In L. Heininen, H. Exner-Pirot, & J. Barnes (Eds.), Arctic Yearbook 2021: defining and mapping sovereignties, policies and perceptions (pp. 279–292). Arctic Portal.
Cao, T. L. (2025). Rethinking openness: A social constructivist approach to the promises of the new museology. In K. De Wild & N. Povroznik (Eds.), Museums on the Web: Exploring the past for the future (pp. 127–148). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003593515-12
Caruso, G., & Buzinde, C. N. (2025). Participation and museums featuring Sámi culture. Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jcms.220
Christou, P. A. (2022). How to use thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Tourism, 3(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.4337/jqrt.2023.0006
Chang, E. (2006). Interactive experiences and contextual learning in museums. Studies in Art Education, 47(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2006.11650492
Cooper, E. A., Spinei, M., & Varnajot, A. (2020). Countering “arctification”: Dawson City’s “sourtoe cocktail”. Journal of Tourism Futures, 6(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-01-2019-0008
Courvoisier, F. (2020). La mutation culturelle et digitale des musées. In C. Bujard, J. Lagier, & N. Montargot (Eds.), Organisations créatives et culturelles: évolution et mutations (pp. 61–82). ISTE Editions.
Demirović Bajrami, D., Vuksanović, N., Petrović, M. D., & Tretiakova, T. N. (2022). Competencies of a museum guide as predictors of visitors’ learning outcomes: a case from Canada. Journal of Museum Education, 47(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2022.2062542
Edelheim, J., & Lee, Y.-S. (2017). Tourists and narration in the Arctic: the changing experience of museums. In Y.-S. Lee, D. B. Weaver, & N. K. Prebensen (Eds.), Arctic tourism experiences: Production, consumption, and sustainability (pp. 37–47). CABI.
Edensor, T. (2000). Staging tourism: Tourists as performers. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(2), 322–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00082-1
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2016). The museum experience revisited. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315417851
Gössling, S. (2021). Tourism, technology and ICT: a critical review of affordances and concessions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(5), 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1873353
Guo, K., Fan, A., Lehto, X., & Day, J. (2023). Immersive digital tourism: the role of multisensory cues in digital museum experiences. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(6), 1017–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211030319
Haanpää, M., & Hanni-Vaara, P. (2023). Smart and sustainable destination experiences: a content analysis on Finnish tourism experts’ perspectives. In ENTER22 e-Tourism Conference Proceedings (pp. 160–165). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25752-0_18
Hammady, R., Ma, M., & Strathearn, C. (2020). Ambient information visualisation and visitors’ technology acceptance of mixed reality in museums. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), 13(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359590
Hein, G. E. (1999). The constructivist museum. In E. Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), The educational role of the museum (2nd ed., pp. 73–79). Routledge.
Heinonen, K., & Medberg, G. (2018). Netnography as a tool for understanding customers: implications for service research and practice. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(6), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-08-2017-0294
Izzo, F., Camminatiello, I., Sasso, P., Solima, L., & Lombardo, R. (2023). Creating customer, museum and social value through digital technologies: evidence from the MANN Assiri project. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 85, 101502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101502
Jecu, M. (2025). Exploring the role of conceptual art for the New Museology: Conceptual art as method in revisiting objects, their display, and heritage institutions. Heritage & Society, 18(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2024.2327012
Jóhannesson, G., Welling, J., Müller, D., Lundmark, L., Nilsson, R., De la Barre, S., Granås, B., Kvidal-Røvik, T., Rantala, O., Tervo-Kankare, K., & Maher, P. (2022). Arctic tourism in times of change: Uncertain futures – from overtourism to re-starting tourism. Nordic Council of Ministers. https://pub.norden.org/temanord2022-516
Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067
Leoni, M. (2019). From colonialism to tourism: An analysis of cruise ship tourism in Ittoqqortoormiit, East Greenland (Master’s thesis). University of Iceland. https://skemman.is/bitstream/1946/33366/1/Thesis-Marianna-Leoni-From-Colonialism-to-Tourism.pdf
Levent, N., & Pascual-Leone, A. (Eds.). (2014). The multisensory museum: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on touch, sound, smell, memory, and space. Rowman & Littlefield.
Li, J., Zheng, X., Watanabe, I., & Ochiai, Y. (2024). A systematic review of digital transformation technologies in museum exhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 161, 108407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108407
Loureiro, S. M. C., & Nascimento, J. (2021). Shaping a view on the influence of technologies on sustainable tourism. Sustainability, 13(22), 12691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212691
Lu, S. E., Moyle, B., Reid, S., Yang, E., & Liu, B. (2023). Technology and museum visitor experiences: a four stage model of evolution. Information Technology & Tourism, 25(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-023-00252-1
Lund, K. A., Kjartansdóttir, K., & Loftsdóttir, K. (2018). “Puffin love”: Performing and creating Arctic landscapes in Iceland through souvenirs. Tourist Studies, 18(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797617722353
Lundén, A., Varnajot, A., Kulusjärvi, O., & Partanen, M. (2023). Globalised imaginaries, arctification and resistance in Arctic tourism–an arctification perspective on tourism actors’ views on seasonality and growth in Ylläs tourism destination. The Polar Journal, 13(2), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2023.2241248
Lundén, A. (2024). The cult of Santa or Satan? The production of Arctic neo-natures in Christmas tourism: A study on “arctified” natures and troublesome sustainability in the case of the Republic of Santa Claus theme park. Téoros. Revue de Recherche en Tourisme, 43(1).
Marjavaara, R., Nilsson, R. O., & Müller, D. K. (2022). The Arctification of northern tourism: a longitudinal geographical analysis of firm names in Sweden. Polar Geography, 45(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2022.2032449
Massari, F. S., Del Vecchio, P., & Degl’Innocenti, E. (2024). Past for future–museums as a digitalized “interaction platform” for value co-creation in tourism destinations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(5), 1453–1474. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2022-0521
McCall, V., & Gray, C. (2014). Museums and the ‘new museology’: theory, practice and organisational change. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2013.869852
Müller, D. K. (2015). Issues in Arctic tourism. In B. Evengård, J. N. Larsen, & Ø. Paasche (Eds.), The new Arctic (pp. 147–158). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-176024_11
Müller, D. K., & Viken, A. (2017). Toward a de-essentializing of indigenous tourism? In A. Viken & D. K. Müller (Eds.), Tourism and indigeneity in the Arctic (pp. 281–289). Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845416102-018
Paananen, S., Kim, J. C., Kirjavainen, E., Kalving, M., Mitra, K., & Häkkilä, J. (2023, August). Augmenting Indigenous Sámi exhibition: Interactive digital heritage in museum context. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 597–617). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42283-6_32
Pattison, S. A., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). Staff-mediated learning in museums: A social interaction perspective. Visitor Studies, 16(2), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2013.767731
Pencarelli, T. (2020). The digital revolution in the travel and tourism industry. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-019-00160-3
Pettersson, R., & Müller, D. K. (2023). Museums portraying indigenous heritage: the case of Sámi museums in Sweden. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 18(2), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2022.2158740
Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., & Runnel, P. (2014). When the museum becomes the message for participating audiences. In P. Runnel & P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt (Eds.), Democratising the museum: Reflections on participatory technologies (pp. 35–54). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03972-6
Quistgaard, N., & Kahr-Højland, A. (2010). New and innovative exhibition concepts at science centres using communication technologies. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2010.525408
Roelofsen, M., & Carter‐White, R. (2022). Virtual reality as a spatial prompt in geography learning and teaching. Geographical Research, 60(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12551
Runnel, P., Lepik, K., & Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P. (2014). Visitors, users, audiences: Conceptualising people in the museum. In P. Runnel & P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt (Eds.), Democratising the museum: Reflections on participatory technologies (pp. 219–240). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03972-6
Rytkönen, E. (2024, December 5). Meillä on revontulitakuu – vuosia työstetty arktinen tiedenäyttely valmistui Rovaniemelle. Yle. https://yle.fi/a/74-20128843
Schiele, B. (2021). Science museums and centres: evolution and contemporary trends. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 53–76). Routledge.
Specht, I., & Loreit, F. (2021). Empirical knowledge about person-led guided tours in museums: A scoping review. Journal of Interpretation Research, 26(2), 96–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211065653
Stam, D. C. (1993). The informed muse: The implications of the new museology for museum practice. Museum Management and Curatorship, 12(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-7775(93)90071-P
Tham, A., Liu, Y., & Loo, P. T. (2025). Transforming museums with technology and digital innovations: a scoping review of research literature. Tourism Review, 80(3), 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-02-2023-0112
Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Creating place identity through heritage interpretation. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 1(4), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527259608722151
Varnajot, A. (2020). Rethinking Arctic tourism: Tourists’ practices and perceptions of the Arctic in Rovaniemi. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu]. Geographical Society of Northern Finland.
Varnajot, A. (2024). Using social media to examine ambassadorship in tourism. In S. Beames & P. T. Maher (Eds.), Routledge handbook of mobile technology, social media and the outdoors (pp. 259–271). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003367536-26
Varnajot, A., & Saarinen, J. (2021). ‘After glaciers?’ Towards post-Arctic tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 91, 103205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103205
Varnajot, A., & Saarinen, J. (2022). Emerging post-Arctic tourism in the age of Anthropocene: Case Finnish Lapland. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 22(4–5), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2022.2134204
Vola, J. (2017). Hide and exhibit the (in)corporeal ethics of the Arctic Anthropocene. In V. Kinnunen & A. Valtonen (Eds.), Living ethics in a more-than-human world (pp. 57–65). University of Lapland.
Xu, W., Dai, T. T., Shen, Z. Y., & Yao, Y. J. (2023). Effects of technology application on museum learning: A meta-analysis of 42 studies published between 2011 and 2021. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4589–4604. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1976803
Zhang, J., Zou, Y., Li, Y., Peng, C., & Jin, D. (2024). Embodied power: How do museum tourists’ sensory experiences affect place identity? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 60, 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.08.009
Zhou, Y., Chen, J., & Wang, M. (2022). A meta-analytic review on incorporating virtual and augmented reality in museum learning. Educational Research Review, 36, 100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100454
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marianna Leoni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the Journal of Arctic Tourism are licenced under the CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License).
